The Nice Trap

The nice narrow ? Wen leizheng 178154 Do you suppose there is a contradiction mingled with what employers want in employees ( kind employees) and what employees in truth do best ( dis accordant employees)? Why or why not? I dont think there is a contradiction mingled with what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees actu eithery do best (disagreeable employees) , since we can not judge a person totally by one di manpowersion . Highly agreeable employees whitethorn as well achieve high executing as other(a)s if their leadership skill is more(prenominal) enhanced in the pass water of persistence, attentiveness with high standards. uccessful employees usually draw compromises specially when bea of departure is reached and show more cooperation when they feel that disagreeable will not deal out their personal objectives which give the impression as they are high on agreeableness. The article assumes that employers always want agreeable employe es by fault, it could not be true when in most jobs with interpersonally lie jobs such as client service, but the speckle will in spades not be the alike(p) when the employer would like to hire candidates for strategic coif with high potential and take ins strong leadership behavior.Often, the effects of disposition depend on the situation. puke you think of some job situation in which agreeableness is an of the essence(p) virtue? And in which it is harmful? In some vitrines agreeable is an authorized virtue . For example , if the fiddle need all the employees work unneurotic , agreeableness from all subordinates would be an alpha virtue because there would not be time to stop, argue, and disagree . In such situation , agreeable employees are more likely to work harmony with each other .However , not all agreeableness from employees is considerably , especially when the situation requires all of them to stick to their own point of witness . Agreeable employees always subscribe to to compromise instead of arguing with others when their opinions are opposite to others , which sometimes may miss the best way to cream the problem . In some seek , the forbid affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women ( that is , being agreeable hurt mens earning more than womens ) .Why do you think this might be the case ? The reason why the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women can be divers(a) . One of the possible reason may be the factor that women are more communicative type playing as a intermediator in numerous aspects . Some research has conducted that women are more automatic to communicate with their employers if they are not comfortable with their earning .The Nice TrapThe nice trap ? Wen leizheng 178154 Do you think there is a contradiction between what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees actually do best (disagreeable employees)? Why or why not? I dont think there is a contradiction between what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees actually do best (disagreeable employees) , since we can not judge a person only by one symmetry . Highly agreeable employees may also achieve high performance as others if their leadership skill is more enhanced in the form of persistence, attentiveness with high standards. uccessful employees usually make compromises specially when area of conflict is reached and show more cooperation when they feel that disagreeable will not serve their personal objectives which give the impression as they are high on agreeableness. The article assumes that employers always want agreeable employees by fault, it could not be true when in some jobs with interpersonally oriented jobs such as customer service, but the situation will definitely not be the same when the employer would like to hire candidates for strategic position with high potential and necessarily strong lead ership behavior.Often, the effects of personality depend on the situation. Can you think of some job situation in which agreeableness is an important virtue? And in which it is harmful? In some cases agreeable is an important virtue . For example , if the work need all the employees work together , agreeableness from all subordinates would be an important virtue because there would not be time to stop, argue, and disagree . In such situation , agreeable employees are more likely to work harmony with each other .However , not all agreeableness from employees is good , especially when the situation requires all of them to stick to their own point of view . Agreeable employees always choose to compromise instead of arguing with others when their opinions are opposite to others , which sometimes may miss the best way to solve the problem . In some research , the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women ( that is , being agreeable hurt mens earning more than womens ) .Why do you think this might be the case ? The reason why the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women can be various . One of the possible reason may be the factor that women are more communicative type acting as a mediator in numerous aspects . Some research has conducted that women are more willing to communicate with their employers if they are not satisfied with their earning .