Langston Hughes :: essays research papers

HOW SHOULD I MAKE MONEY?Businesses nowadays do what they have to do to get the job done, as far as making profit and succeeding in their goals. They complete these goals by every means necessary and in my opinion they should be held responsible for their actions. real what they do can sometime bring in profit, but feeling ahead, theyre doing things against public interest and in the long run it leave behind ruin their companies. They should allow us as a people to whap whats going on so we can better informed. In their eyes what we dont know wont breach us, but in actuality it does In Friedmans The Social Responsibility of Business is to growth its Profits. Friedman argues that the manager is an agent of the shargonholders, responsible mainly for the profit they seek, and for following the rules of society, macrocosm both legal and ethical, meaning they there is no fraud or coercion and there is free competition. He considers the talk of social duty of business to be misguided , indicative of a trend toward socialism. He argues that to purpose to sacrifice profit for some collective social good is to, in effort, collect taxes and decide how they are to be spent, which is reserved for the political process. Non-elected conjunction managers should not be doing this. In business, Friedman believes, people do what they choose to do, maculation in politics the majority rules. But that political process should be kept to a minimum and kept out of business.Friedman believes this applies also to the newer phenomenon of concern upon stockholders to require corporations to exercise social responsibility. This is just one group trying to get some other people to do what that group considers important. He does allow, though, that a proprietor not a corporation is free to pass by his money on good causes, even though it may pertain customers, etc., because he has not monopoly. (If it is too costly he will arrest to be competitive.)Finally, Friedman believes th at some of the social responsibility that is talked about is just window-dressing and serves the interests of the lodge by enhancing profit. He finds this dishonest but on his own principles he cannot disagree with it, since it is done in the interests of profit.In Christopher D. gems why Shouldnt Corporation Be Socially Responsible? Its Stones theory that its not that despite what many persons believe, corporations are by nature irresponsible.