Life of Pi: Use of a Unreliable Narrator Essay

An treacherous bank clerk batch suck you into his or her worldview and perhaps even make you take sides before a writer reveals a broader perspective, one that he/she has missed or omitted. rase if a story is written so you doubt the narrator from the beginning, an undependable narrator is still the one taking you through the story, so you precipitate on to their words. Perhaps a certain dialogue or an showcase will uncover details the narrator does no. realize and discover that as an unreliable narrator, their word can no longer be trusted. (Jada Bradley). In the book Life of Pi, Pi reveals himself as an unreliable narrator.Although Pi defines himself as an unpredictable narrator through the final events in the story, Pi gives hints of false information throughout the book. As a reader, you adhere on to his words because he is the one taking you through the bet of his epic move around. Pi in the final scene of the story subsequently his journey crossways the Pacific, t ells the Japanese Oceanic Authorities contradicting stories. Pi So, you didnt like my story? Mr.Okamoto No, we liked it very much. Didnt we , Atsuro? We will withdraw it for a long, long time. Mr.Chiba We will. SilenceMr.Okamoto But for the purposes of our investigation, we would like to know what really happened. Pi What really happened? Mr. Okamoto Yes. Pi So you want another story? Mr. Okamoto Uhhno. We would like to know what really happened. Pi leads you to believe that he is solely making up the second greenback to satisfy the two handss disbelief in his first story. However, if you reexamine the book you drive that the second report could actually be a true account. at once you see that there are two valid stories, and the reader must(prenominal) choose which story is accurate based on their own conclusions active Pi.Throughout Pis journey there are probationary events that hint at his unreliability as an narrator. These incidents can influence your resource on which story you find factual, like sketchy witnesses in a crime investigation. For instance, during his voyage, Pi encounters another blind castaway who jumps on Pis boat to kill him but, is killed by Richard Parker. This event is extremely unrealistic, for the opening move of two blind castaways encountering each other in the worlds largest ocean is simply far-fetched. You may sense some disbelief in this occurrence yet, you still trust his word. For Pi hasnt yet addicted the reader a reason to disbelieve him as the narrator.Pis story from the boat sinking and the loss of his family, to his terrible journey across the Pacific Ocean is a horrible tragedy. You mourn for him and his horrible stain and through this sorrow you dont realize that he could be making this all up. Usually when you read stories you want the main flake to pay back a happy ending. However, in Life of Pi, when you discover you can no longer trust Pis account, you lose your self-condemnation for him and his predi cament. Crossen states this plainly in her Wall Street Journal article on unreliable narrators, Unfortunately, to point out that a book has an unreliable narrator is to spoil the thrill of losing your innocence. Cheering for the main character becomes vile when you have lost trust in their word.Pis first account of a boy and a Bengal tiger surviving a journey across the Pacific Ocean is fantastic tale but passably believable. However, by the end of the novel our perception of Pi as the vote counter has been tainted. Our perspective of anyones account of their lives depends on our own experiences and knowledge. As David Fromkin states in The Way of the World, Life is a story that each of us tells to his or her self and it therefore is a tale told by an unreliable narrator.