Reaction to Film Brainwashing 101 :: essays research papers

The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, defines nonsubjective as1.Consisting of, concerning, or based on documents.2.Presenting facts objectively without editorializing or inserting fictional matter, as in a book or call for.Academic yield.com is the website to which viewers argon order for more information about the film. On this site, it is stated, In this cutting expos, documentary filmmakers Maloney, Browning and Greenberg shine a light on political correctness, donnish prepossession, student censorship--even administrative cover-ups of death threatsThis positioning of the movie presents that it is, in fact, a documentary. My belief is that, based on definition 2 above, the movie is non a documentary, but instead a good example of the the facts sing for themselves actually means the facts, as I subscribe carefully pose them, support my position.Evan Maloney, the filmmaker, is clearly working in the style of Michael Moore. The film utili zes mockery throughout evidence the old Popularity instructional film where overdubbing is used. Interviews are presented offering only on side of the issue. Surprise attempts at interviewers for comic rilievo are sprung on unsuspecting university officials. Subtle visual effects, such as student Charles Mitchell sitting with an American flag blanket behind him are used. Ultimately, what happened in the change process of Brainwashing 101 is a flesh out unknown. Farhenhype 911 demonstrated how Michael Moore had edited President Bushs address to the haves, and have mores, when in fact, the setting was a charity benefit at which Al Gore was also present. Given the style of the movie, I believe editing was used for key advantage. The movie purports to address political correctness, academic bias and student censorship. I believe that the movie does do this, and utilizing real examples industrial plant to create legitimacy for the move. In an admittedly unscientific search of the net profit about this movie, I found a fair number of constructive reactions to the film. So some people do find the movie convincing, as people do with Michael Moore movies. To academic bias, a long section of the film is devoted the teaching of economics and which theories of economics should be taught. As presented in the movie, by virtue of being taught, different theories represent a bias in and of itself. Student Charles Mitchell makes the unusual statement that Marxist study is a value judgment. To me, this is not a new breakthrough in approximation it could be argued that all education, throughout history, has been biased based on what has been taught.